Unit economics, use of funds, TAM analysis, and runway calculations — structured to anchor your fundraising narrative and remove every reasonable objection before it surfaces.
Investors don't reject decks for ugly design. They reject them for unit economics that don't add up, TAM math that's obviously inflated, and a use-of-funds slide that doesn't tie to a credible plan. We fix that.
CAC, LTV, payback period, gross margin, contribution margin. Calculated bottom-up from your real cohort data — or sector benchmarks if you're pre-revenue.
TAM/SAM/SOM with both top-down and bottom-up triangulation. Defensible source citations, no hand-waving multipliers.
Granular allocation by function and quarter. Tied to milestone targets and burn projections so the round size isn't an arbitrary number.
Slide-ready financial content with all underlying calculations. Delivered as Excel workbook plus PowerPoint/Keynote-ready visuals.
Scope and complexity priced per engagement · Free 15-min scoping call
Book a 15-minute introductory call. We'll review your deck and identify the gaps before investors do.
Schedule a Free Consultation →We focus on the financial content, charts, and data tables — and we deliver them as PNG exports and native files (Keynote/PowerPoint) ready to drop into your deck. For full deck design, we partner with specialist deck designers and can refer you.
Yes. Pre-revenue unit economics are built bottom-up from pricing, expected conversion rates, sales cycle length, and benchmarked retention from comparable sector data. We document every assumption so investors can stress-test it.
We triangulate top-down (industry reports) with bottom-up (your ICP × pricing × penetration). Investors instantly recognize a single-source TAM number — and dismiss it. The triangulated approach signals you've done the work.
Yes — and it usually should. The pitch deck is the headline; the model is the proof. Engagements that bundle both are priced together at a discount versus separate scopes.
